What the difference between "AMD64" (only supported by InstallShield 9.01 SP1 for x64-products) and "x64" (referenced by Windows Installer's documentation as only value for x64-products) values in Template Summary of WI-database?
ORCA for example gives a choice of them both...
This is a ready-only archive of the InstallSite Forum. You cannot post any new content here. / Dies ist ein Archiv des InstallSite Forums. Hier können keine neuen Beiträge veröffentlicht werden.
AMD64 and x64
Started by
Sedov Roman
, Mar 29 2006 14:00
3 replies to this topic
Stefan Krueger
-
- Administrators
- 13,269 posts
InstallSite.org
Posted 30 March 2006 - 09:22
If I recall correctly AMD64 was replaced by x64 to include both AMD and Intel.
Stefan Krüger
InstallSite.org twitter facebook
Sedov Roman
-
- Full Members
- 16 posts
Posted 30 March 2006 - 09:54
Thank you for response.
Yes, I've understood it in the same way.
Yesterday I've try use "x64" ("AMD64" is OK) in InstallShield 11.5 - there's error during validation of the package (MSM or MSI) the error occured:
"ISDEV : error ICE39: PID_TEMPLATE value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. It must be of the form "Platform,Platform,...;LangID,LangID,...". _SummaryInfo 7"
Of course, I can just update CUB-files (for example with ones from MS Platform SDK Windows Server R2 and may be older), but is it a clean solution?
Yes, I've understood it in the same way.
Yesterday I've try use "x64" ("AMD64" is OK) in InstallShield 11.5 - there's error during validation of the package (MSM or MSI) the error occured:
"ISDEV : error ICE39: PID_TEMPLATE value in Summary Information Stream is not valid. It must be of the form "Platform,Platform,...;LangID,LangID,...". _SummaryInfo 7"
Of course, I can just update CUB-files (for example with ones from MS Platform SDK Windows Server R2 and may be older), but is it a clean solution?
Sedov Roman
-
- Full Members
- 16 posts
Posted 06 April 2006 - 10:28
Just tried InstallShield 12 Beta - the same behaivor as in 11.5! 